Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Infect Chemother ; 2024 Feb 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417479

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Factors that affect the change of first-line antimicrobial agents were investigated to further promote their appropriate use. METHODS: This descriptive study used an electronic medical records database. Total 16,353 of the 199,896 patients enrolled between 1996 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and formed the overall pediatric acute otitis media (AOM) cohort. The factors leading to the change in first-line antimicrobial agents within 14 days were analyzed using classification and regression trees (CART) analysis. RESULTS: This antimicrobial treatment cohort, involved 4860 cases of AOM alone and 9567 cases of AOM with other diseases. The size of the medical facility based on number of beds and historical duration of patient registration impacted on antimicrobial changes. CONCLUSIONS: The current results show that hospital-wide or nation-wide antimicrobial stewardship promotion could be the most influencing factor for antimicrobial changes. Particularly in cases of AOM where other diseases coexist, a more accurate diagnosis and definition of treatment failure of first-line drug are suggested to be important while establishing future treatment strategies. The current study is important to promote appropriate antimicrobial use for AOM treatment.

3.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 24(4): 351-360, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38141632

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Licensed mRNA COVID-19 vaccines require booster doses to sustain SARS-CoV-2-specific responses, creating the need for novel, broadly immunogenic vaccines. We aimed to compare the immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of ARCT-154-a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 D614G variant-with the BNT162b2 (Comirnaty; Pfizer-BioNTech) mRNA vaccine when administered as a fourth-dose booster. METHODS: This double-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial, conducted at 11 outpatient clinical sites in Japan, enrolled healthy adults aged at least 18 years who had previously been immunised with two doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 [Spikevax; Moderna]) followed by a third dose of BNT162b2 at least 3 months before enrolment. Participants were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio using an Interactive Response Technology system with a block size of four, and with stratification by age (18-64 years or ≥65 years) and by interval since last COVID-19 vaccination (<5 months or ≥5 months), to receive either ARCT-154 or BNT162b2 as a fourth-dose booster via deltoid intramuscular injection. Participants and investigators assessing outcomes were masked to group assignment. The primary objective, measured in per-protocol set 1 (consisting of participants with no evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection who received their intended injection according to protocol), was to show that the immune response 28 days after the ARCT-154 vaccine was non-inferior to that of the BNT162b2 vaccine, measured in terms of both pseudovirus neutralising antibody geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios and seroresponse rates against the wild-type Wuhan-Hu-1 strain of SARS-CoV-2. Non-inferiority was declared when the lower limit of the 95% CI of the ARCT-154 to BNT162b2 GMT ratio exceeded 0·67, and when the lower limit for the difference in seroresponse rates exceeded -10%. Key secondary endpoints included the immune response against the omicron BA.4/5 subvariant, which was assessed for non-inferiority and superiority in per-protocol set 1. Safety was assessed in the full analysis set. This study was registered on the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials, jRCT 2071220080, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Dec 13, 2022, and Feb 25, 2023, we enrolled and randomly assigned 828 participants to receive ARCT-154 (n=420) or BNT162b2 (n=408) vaccines as a fourth-dose booster. In per-protocol set 1, the GMTs of surrogate neutralising antibodies induced against the Wuhan-Hu-1 SARS-CoV-2 strain in the ARCT-154 group (5641 [95% CI 4321-7363]) were non-inferior to those in the BNT162b2 group (3934 [2993-5169]) when measured at 28 days after boosting, with a GMT ratio of 1·43 (95% CI 1·26-1·63). Seroresponse rates were 65·2% (95% CI 60·2-69·9) in the ARCT-154 group versus 51·6% (46·4-56·8) in the BNT162b2 group, a difference of 13·6% (95% CI 6·8-20·5). GMTs against the omicron BA.4/5 variant on day 29 were 2551 (1687-3859) in the ARCT-154 group and 1958 (1281-2993) in the BNT162b2 group-a GMT ratio of 1·30 (1·07-1·58)-with seroresponse rates of 69·9% (65·0-74·4) and 58·0% (52·8-63·1). Both boosters were equally well tolerated. No treatment-related deaths were reported, nor were there severe or serious adverse events considered to be causally associated related to study vaccination. One serious adverse event, a foot deformity reported in a participant in the BNT162b2 group, was observed but determined not to have a causal relationship to the study vaccination. One severe adverse event, a case of abnormal hepatic function in the ARCT-154 group, was considered to be related to study vaccine. Adverse events of special interest for detection of myocarditis and pericarditis included chest pain (one case in the ARCT-154 group and three cases in the BNT162b2 group) and shortness of breath (two cases in the BNT162b2 group), all of which were considered to have a reasonable possibility of being related to vaccination. Local reactions were reported by 398 (95%) of 420 participants receiving the ARCT-154 vaccine and 395 (97%) of 408 participants receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine, and solicited systemic adverse events by 276 (66%) of those receiving the ARCT-154 vaccine and 255 (63%) of those receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. Adverse events were mainly mild in severity, occurring and resolving within 3-4 days after vaccination. INTERPRETATION: In adults who had previously received three doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, immune responses 28 days after an ARCT-154 booster dose were non-inferior to those observed after a BNT162b2 booster dose for the Wuhan-Hu-1 strain of SARS-CoV-2 and superior for the Omicron BA.4/5 variant. Increased immune responses at 28 days might provide increased likelihood of protection against these strains during this period and could also result in longer duration of protection. Further studies will assess the immunogenicity induced against more recent SARS-CoV-2 variants. FUNDING: Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Imunogenicidade da Vacina , Vacinas de mRNA , RNA , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Idoso
4.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37926930

RESUMO

AIMS: A meta-analysis of short-term studies revealed no significant differences between the doses of asenapine, 10 and 20 mg/day, in the acute treatment of schizophrenia. However, it should be noted that many patients from clinical practice were excluded, and the dose-response to asenapine in a real-world setting is still unclear. Additionally, the dose-response in the maintenance phase is not clear. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in the efficacy of different asenapine doses in patients with maintenance phase of schizophrenia in a real-world setting. METHODS: This study conducted post-marketing surveillance of asenapine in clinical settings in Japan. It followed patients diagnosed with schizophrenia who received asenapine for the first time for a maximum of 52 weeks. These patients were divided into two categories based on their average daily asenapine dosage: ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day. Asenapine efficacy was assessed by adjusting for patient demographics using multivariate logistic regression analysis, employing the Clinical Global Impression-Global Improvement (CGI-I) scale, which has seven categories. RESULTS: A total of 2774 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 1689 and 1085 patients were treated with asenapine ≤10 mg/day and >10 mg/day, respectively. The CGI-I improvement rate was significantly higher in the asenapine >10 group (p = 0.012) after adjusting for patient background factors. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that asenapine doses >10 mg/day may be more effective than 10 mg/day in the treatment of schizophrenia; however, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

5.
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep ; 43(3): 328-337, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232002

RESUMO

After completion of a 6-week double-blind trial of asenapine sublingual tablets (10 or 20 mg/day) versus placebo in Asian patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia, including Japanese patients, this open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a 52-week treatment with asenapine at flexible doses. In 201 subjects, including 44 who had received placebo (P/A group) and 157 who had received asenapine (A/A group) in the feeder trial, adverse events occurred at rates of 90.9% and 85.4% and serious adverse events at rates of 11.4% and 20.4%, respectively. One patient in the P/A group died. No clinically significant abnormal measurements of body weight, body mass index, or glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and prolactin levels were observed. The sustained efficacy rate, as evaluated by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score and other measures, remained at approximately 50% between 6 and 12 months of treatment. These results suggest that long-term treatment with asenapine is well tolerated and provides sustained efficacy.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Esquizofrenia , Humanos , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Seguimentos , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico
7.
CNS Spectr ; 27(3): 369-377, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33461636

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Differences in psychiatric background and dose-response to asenapine in patients with schizophrenia were examined based on efficacy and safety, using data obtained in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with schizophrenia were classified into three clusters by a cluster analysis based on the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) subscores at baseline, using the data from a 6-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. PANSS Marder factor scores were calculated for each cluster. The efficacy of 10 or 20 mg/day of asenapine on PANSS score was used as the primary endpoint, with the incidence of adverse events evaluated as the secondary endpoint. RESULTS: A total of 529 asenapine-treated patients were classified into 3 clusters: Cluster-P with the higher scores in positive symptoms, disorganized thoughts, and hostility/excitement, Cluster-N with higher scores in negative symptoms, and Cluster-L with overall lower scores. In Cluster-N and Cluster-L, both 10 and 20 mg/day groups showed significant improvement in PANSS scores, while only the 20 mg/day group showed a significant difference in Cluster-P. Cluster-N and Cluster-L had differences in the incidence of adverse events, but this was not seen in Cluster-P. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of asenapine 10 and 20 mg/day differed between the 3 clusters of patients. This suggests that background information regarding baseline psychiatric symptoms may affect the therapeutic response in patients with schizophrenia.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Análise por Conglomerados , Dibenzocicloeptenos , Método Duplo-Cego , Compostos Heterocíclicos de 4 ou mais Anéis/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Infect Chemother ; 27(10): 1413-1422, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34183234

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We investigated changes in prescriptions for antimicrobial agents to treat children with acute otitis media (AOM). METHODS: A descriptive study using an electronic medical record database. Of 199,896 patients enrolled between 2001 and 2019, a total of 10,797 were aged <16 years and had AOM as their first and primary disease (overall pediatric AOM cohort). In addition, 4786 patients with AOM without other comorbidities (pediatric AOM cohort) were included. RESULTS: In the overall pediatric AOM cohort, the age distribution ranged from 11% to 23% for those younger than 2 years and from 66% to 77% for those younger than 6 years, with no change over time. In the pediatric AOM cohort, the antimicrobial prescription rate was 91% in 2001 but declined to 40% by 2019. Antimicrobial use increased from 0% to 75% for penicillins, whereas use of cephalosporins decreased from 84% to 10%. The prescription rate for acetaminophen alone increased from 33% to 58%. There were no differences in the incidence of adverse reactions among the prescribed antimicrobials. CONCLUSIONS: Due to education efforts and promotion of the proper use of antimicrobials through means such as the Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute otitis media in children (2006) and the Manual of Antimicrobial Stewardship (2016), a change in the use of antimicrobials occurred, leading to a trend to more proper use of these agents.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Otite Média , Doença Aguda , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Japão/epidemiologia , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Otite Média/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas
9.
Ther Innov Regul Sci ; 55(3): 523-538, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33393013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Multi-regional clinical trials (MRCTs) are an efficient drug development strategy for eliminating drug lag in East Asian countries. In planning MRCTs according to the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E17 guideline, it is expected that East Asian populations with relatively similar ethnicity can be pooled as one population. However, evidence supporting this assumption is limited. This study aimed to investigate population/regional differences considering influencing factors among East Asian regions using MRCT data as a research model. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy of two drugs, asenapine, a schizophrenia drug, and tadalafil, a dysuria drug for benign prostatic hyperplasia, using MRCT data from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. First, predictive factors and effect modifiers were evaluated. Then, population/regional differences were evaluated using multivariate regression models, with the interaction term Region-by-Treatment group and adjustment for influencing intrinsic/extrinsic factors. RESULTS: Among the 4 outcomes for the two drugs, no significant population/regional differences were detected (P > 0.05) by the adjusted regression models. The effect modifiers, such as pretreatment drug status or concurrent diseases, were common among countries. CONCLUSIONS: No significant population/regional efficacy differences were found for the two drugs among the three regions. This finding supported the possible applicability of the region pooling strategy for MRCTs in East Asia, emphasizing the benefits of exploring ethnic difference/influencing factors at an early stage to design further confirmatory studies. However, further evidence for various drugs should be accumulated.


Assuntos
Preparações Farmacêuticas , Esquizofrenia , Disuria , Humanos , Japão , República da Coreia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esquizofrenia/tratamento farmacológico , Taiwan
10.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 63(3): 207-23, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20976878

RESUMO

A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media in Children, in view of the causative organisms of the disease and their drug susceptibility, was issued in March 2006. In the guideline, cefditoren pivoxil (CDTR-PI, Meiact MS fine granules 10% for pediatric use) is recommended as an oral cephem antibiotic for the treatment of the disease. To collect information on the appropriate use of the drug in the clinical setting after issuance of the guideline, we conducted a specific postmarketing study of CDTR-PI in pediatric patients with acute otitis media. With this study, 2144 patients were enrolled in 305 medical institutions. Of them, 2006 and 1958 patients were chosen for safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 1.79% (36/2006 patients). No unexpected or serious adverse drug reactions were reported by this study. The most common adverse drug reaction was diarrhea, which was reported in 26 cases (1.30%). The symptom resolved or subsided during CDTR-PI therapy or after discontinuation or completion of the therapy in all cases. The incidence of diarrhea in patients treated with CDTR-PI at 1.5- to 2-fold the usual dose was 2.70%, which was slightly higher than the usual dose, but that in patients more than 2-fold the usual dose was 1.92% which was not higher than 1.5- to 2-fold the usual dose. The incidence of diarrhea itself was not substantially high. Concerning the clinical efficacy of CDTR-PI, the response rate was 93.5% (1831/1958 patients). Among 1217 strains from whom 832 patients were detected as causative organisms at baseline bacteriological examination, the response rate by causative organism was 89.7% for Streptococcus pneumoniae, 90.3% for Haemophilus influenzae, and 92.2% for Moraxella catarrhalis. Among documented eradication of 577 strains with 427 patients, the bacterial eradication rate by causative organism was 83.3% for S. pneumoniae, 87.1% for H. influenzae, and 88.9% for M. catarrhalis. For each major resistant strain, the response rate was 88.0% for penicillin-intermediate S. pneumoniae (PISP), 90.1% for penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP), and 92.5% for beta-lactamase negative ampicillin-resistant H. influenzae (BLNAR), while the bacterial eradication rate was 85.7% for PISP, 77.5% for PRSP, and 81.8% for BLNAR. In addition, 457 patients "without myringotomy" and "tympanic swelling or otorrhea rated as a severity score of 8" (symptoms emphasized in the guideline) were selected as a subpopulation allowing us to define the dose-efficacy relationship more clearly. In this subpopulation, the relationship between the dose and the efficacy of CDTR-PI was assessed. The assessment revealed that the response rate was significantly higher in patients with a mean daily dose of at least 13.5 mg/kg than in those with a mean daily dose below 13.5 mg/kg. In summary, CDTR-PI raised no noteworthy concerns about its safety or efficacy in pediatric patients with acute otitis media. These findings reconfirm the usefulness of the drug.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Otite Média/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Otite Média/microbiologia
11.
Jpn J Antibiot ; 63(4): 299-311, 2010 Aug.
Artigo em Japonês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21298863

RESUMO

Rheumatic fever and acute glomerulonephritis are known to occur secondary to infection with Streptococcus pyogenes, and early elimination of the Streptococcus pyogenes by treatment with an appropriate antibiotic is required. Treatment with penicillins for 10 days has been recommended for Streptococcus pyogenes infections, but cephems are also now being used, and cefditoren pivoxil (CDTR-PI) is listed as one of the recommended drugs in the Guidelines for the Management of Respiratory Infectious Disease in Children in Japan 2007. We therefore conducted this study in order to collect appropriate use information in the clinical setting of CDTR-PI to treat Streptococcus pyogenes infections. In this study, 790 patients were enrolled in 147 institutions. Of them, 734 and 718 patients were chosen for safety and efficacy analysis, respectively. There were 11 adverse drug reactions in 11 patients, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 1.50% (11/734 patients). The most common adverse drug reactions were diarrhea and hematuria, and there were 3 events of each, but a positive urinalysis after administration were only obserbed without the clinical symptoms. With the exception of the 3 patients in which the patient did not return to the hospital and the outcome is unknown, the patients either recovered from all of the adverse drug reactions or they were relieved. No serious adverse drug reactions were reported in this study. The response rate was 98.5% for laryngopharyngitis (457/464 patients) and 98.4% (250/254 patients) for tonsillitis. Examination of the response rates according to patient background showed that they were high, 95% or more, in every group. The Streptococcus pyogenes eradication rate was 94.6% for laryngopharyngitis (194/205 patients) and 92.4% (110/119 patients) for tonsillitis. In summary, CDTR-PI exhibited excellent safety and efficacy in laryngopharyngitis and tonsillitis caused by Streptococcus pyogenes, and CDTR-PI was reconfirmed as a useful drug.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Cefalosporinas/administração & dosagem , Laringite/tratamento farmacológico , Laringite/microbiologia , Faringite/tratamento farmacológico , Faringite/microbiologia , Infecções Estreptocócicas , Streptococcus pyogenes , Tonsilite/tratamento farmacológico , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Cefalosporinas/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Formas de Dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Streptococcus pyogenes/isolamento & purificação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...